Post-1966, 220 rollfilm could be used in addition to 120, and from 1973 a Schneider Xenotar lens of similar specification was fitted to most models. The 2.8F was announced in 1960 and came with the now legendary 80mm f/2.8 Zeiss Planar lens. The Rolleiflex 2.8F is widely regarded as the ‘Rolls-Royce’ of TLRs, with a build, finish and image quality that is hard to beat, let alone match (except, perhaps, with a Rolleiflex 3.5F). In recent years the original Russian cameras have suffered from the ‘halo effect’ of Lomography’s near-£300 Lubitel 166+, so while there are still £10 bargains to be had, they are fewer of them. That said, it’s the lo-fi aspect that most are looking for when they choose a Lubitel, and the 166B is often happy to oblige: the red viewing window and plastic construction can result in light leaks multiple exposures (both accidental and deliberate) are easy to achieve and both focus and exposure can fall-off at the edges of the frame.
There’s a PC sync socket for flash, a 40.5mm filter thread, and although Lubitels are often associated with ‘toy cameras’, the 75mm triplet lens can produce a reasonable result. However, what you get for your money isn’t all bad. In essence, it’s a simplified version of the company’s original 166, which was designed to be cheaper to manufacture and buy. Lomo’s Lubitel 166B is an often-maligned plastic TLR that emerged from the Soviet Union in 1980.
0 kommentar(er)
